Networking-Forums.com

General Category => Forum Lobby => Topic started by: deanwebb on April 01, 2016, 11:36:56 AM

Title: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: deanwebb on April 01, 2016, 11:36:56 AM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day_Request_for_Comments had some fun stuff relative to today, but then I saw this...

http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/

"11 years ago, April 1st 1990, rfc 1149 was written. This rfc specifies a protocol for IP over avian carriers, CPIP (carrier pigeon internet protocol). In 11 years, noone has bothered to implement this important protocol stack. But happily, we don't need to wait any longer! BLUG in cooperation with Vesta Brevdueforening has given you rfc 1149 support for Linux."

:zomgwtfbbq: :rofl:

LOG OF THE PING SESSION
Script started on Sat Apr 28 11:24:09 2001
vegard@gyversalen:~$ /sbin/ifconfig tun0
tun0      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol 
          inet addr:10.0.3.2  P-t-P:10.0.3.1  Mask:255.255.255.255
          UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST  MTU:150  Metric:1
          RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0
          RX bytes:88 (88.0 b)  TX bytes:168 (168.0 b)

vegard@gyversalen:~$ ping -i 900 10.0.3.1
PING 10.0.3.1 (10.0.3.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=6165731.1 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=3211900.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=5124922.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=6388671.9 ms

--- 10.0.3.1 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 55% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 3211900.8/5222806.6/6388671.9 ms
vegard@gyversalen:~$ exit

Script done on Sat Apr 28 14:14:28 2001


:haha2:
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: Reggle on April 02, 2016, 01:39:31 AM
RFC 1149 was implemented later on: http://www.stuff.co.nz/oddstuff/2851526/Pigeon-post-faster-than-internet
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: deanwebb on April 02, 2016, 09:08:04 AM
This is one reason why most networking/computer humor is better seen than stated. Such as:

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Buffer overflow.
Buffer overflow who?
080483be <main>:
   80483be:       8d 4c 24 04             lea    0x4(%esp),%ecx
   80483c2:       83 e4 f0                and    $0xfffffff0,%esp
   80483c5:       ff 71 fc                pushl  0xfffffffc(%ecx)
   80483c8:       55                      push   %ebp
   80483c9:       89 e5                   mov    %esp,%ebp
   80483cb:       51                      push   %ecx
   80483cc:       83 ec 04                sub    $0x4,%esp
   80483cf:       c7 04 24 bc 84 04 08    movl   $0x80484bc,(%esp)
   80483d6:       e8 f5 fe ff ff          call   80482d0 <puts@plt>
   80483db:       e8 c0 ff ff ff          call   80483a0 <doit>
   80483e0:       c7 04 24 cd 84 04 08    movl   $0x80484cd,(%esp)
   80483e7:       e8 e4 fe ff ff          call   80482d0 <puts@plt>
   80483ec:       b8 00 00 00 00          mov    $0x0,%eax
   80483f1:       83 c4 04                add    $0x4,%esp
   80483f4:       59                      pop    %ecx
   80483f5:       5d                      pop    %ebp
   80483f6:       8d 61 fc                lea    0xfffffffc(%ecx),%esp
   80483f9:       c3                      ret
   80483fa:       90                      nop
   80483fb:       90                      nop
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: scottsee on April 09, 2016, 01:52:23 AM
I like the UDP one.

Knock knock
Who dare?
UDP
UDP who?

I never said it was funny. I just like it.
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: deanwebb on April 09, 2016, 10:28:15 AM
DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ARP JOKES? PLEASE TELL 67.76.32.131.
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: Dieselboy on July 06, 2016, 03:05:55 AM
OP does the traffic actually go through an actual pidgeon or what? Just wondering why it takes over 70 days for an ICMP RTT.

BTW, the "threshold" for VOIP is 300ms RTT maximum, so this wouldn't be suitable for VOIP, FYI.

:partay:
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: icecream-guy on July 06, 2016, 07:25:06 AM
HEY EVERYONE I HAVE A GRATUITOUS ARP JOKE!
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: icecream-guy on July 06, 2016, 07:26:10 AM
what does the network seal say??

ARP ARP
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: deanwebb on July 06, 2016, 07:42:06 AM
HOW TO DESTROY A KNOCK KNOCK JOKE WITH 802.1X

Knock knock
Who's there?
Banana
May I see your machine certificate?
Ummm... no, you're supposed to say "Banana who?"
RADIUS-Rejected
Hey, why am I in a tiny padded cell with a note that I need to download the latest antivirus patch before I log on to the guest network?
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: Dieselboy on July 06, 2016, 09:40:32 AM
You lot are crazy.

:zomgwtfbbq: :rofl:
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: Otanx on July 06, 2016, 10:20:26 AM
IPv4 address walks into a bar. Says "Bartender! Give me a cider, I'm exhausted."

-Otanx
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: icecream-guy on July 06, 2016, 11:11:26 AM
The worst thing about UDP jokes... you never know if someone "gets" them.
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: Otanx on July 06, 2016, 11:51:58 AM
Quote from: ristau5741 on July 06, 2016, 11:11:26 AM
The worst thing about UDP jokes... you never know if someone "gets" them.

As the sender of the UDP joke I don't care if anyone gets them either.

-Otanx
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: icecream-guy on July 06, 2016, 01:53:55 PM
Quote from: Otanx on July 06, 2016, 11:51:58 AM
Quote from: ristau5741 on July 06, 2016, 11:11:26 AM
The worst thing about UDP jokes... you never know if someone "gets" them.

As the sender of the UDP joke I don't care if anyone gets them either.



That's as old as RFC #1
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: deanwebb on July 06, 2016, 08:42:59 PM
An IPv6 packet walks into a bar. Nobody pays any attention to it.
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: Dieselboy on July 06, 2016, 10:32:31 PM
Click this image link, and zoom out then zoom in. It's a mosaic.

http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/adventuretimewithfinnandjake/images/c/c0/Epic-facepalm.jpg
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: deanwebb on July 07, 2016, 09:17:31 AM
I'd be more impressed if it was all animated GIFs.
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: Dieselboy on July 08, 2016, 12:01:38 AM
That's a good idea.

Can I get an estimation of the time required? Then I'll consider it.

:problem?:
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: deanwebb on July 08, 2016, 08:42:45 AM
We should probably crowdsource this project.
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: icecream-guy on July 08, 2016, 11:01:15 AM
..and I had the mandatory .gif image to use, but it was too big to upload :(
2017KB
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: deanwebb on July 08, 2016, 02:44:53 PM
Link it to offsite hosting?
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: icecream-guy on July 11, 2016, 07:22:17 AM
Quote from: deanwebb on July 08, 2016, 02:44:53 PM
Link it to offsite hosting?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/p7c25a68rnsybu8/tumblr_nx94001gon1r09l2vo1_400.gif?dl=0

mesmerizing...
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: deanwebb on July 11, 2016, 08:13:30 AM
Dropbox be blocked at my work... now I have to wait to see it until I get home.
Title: Re: Implementation of RFC 1149
Post by: icecream-guy on July 11, 2016, 08:52:06 AM
Quote from: deanwebb on July 11, 2016, 08:13:30 AM
Dropbox be blocked at my work... now I have to wait to see it until I get home.

it's a girls face with wobbly eyeballs stuck all over her face and she's shaking her head...