Self-driving car rampage...

Started by deanwebb, May 27, 2015, 09:22:42 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

deanwebb

True, dat.

It would save lives if people would jump over cars more often.

Maybe we could all get exoskeletons that, if they detect an oncoming car, launch the user 30 feet into the air, so he can clear the oncoming vehicle. But, then, people would complain about hitting tunnels and overpasses and lightposts and trees and stuff like that.
Take a baseball bat and trash all the routers, shout out "IT'S A NETWORK PROBLEM NOW, SUCKERS!" and then peel out of the parking lot in your Ferrari.
"The world could perish if people only worked on things that were easy to handle." -- Vladimir Savchenko
Вопросы есть? Вопросов нет! | BCEB: Belkin Certified Expert Baffler | "Plan B is Plan A with an element of panic." -- John Clarke
Accounting is architecture, remember that!
Air gaps are high-latency Internet connections.

deanwebb

http://thebulletin.org/struggle-ban-killer-robots7150

More on the question of how much autonomy to grant to systems, weapons in this case.

Which made me think about either hacks or, more likely, software problems on semi-autonomous weapon systems. I imagined an airstrip with a range of drones on it when, suddenly, one of them has a glitch that results in an immediate activation of the drone at a fully autonomous level, along with activation of its routines to hunt for targets. Mayhem ensues.
Take a baseball bat and trash all the routers, shout out "IT'S A NETWORK PROBLEM NOW, SUCKERS!" and then peel out of the parking lot in your Ferrari.
"The world could perish if people only worked on things that were easy to handle." -- Vladimir Savchenko
Вопросы есть? Вопросов нет! | BCEB: Belkin Certified Expert Baffler | "Plan B is Plan A with an element of panic." -- John Clarke
Accounting is architecture, remember that!
Air gaps are high-latency Internet connections.