Cisco is at it again!! (Stable releases... NOT)

[Dieselboy]

found out the hard way

so on certain releases of IOS code,
when you SNMP poll MIB 1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.5.4795
or in english lldpXMedMIB

it makes your CPU processor go to 100% and stay there.


Bug ID CSCuu05714

That's a nice feature.

[NetworkGroover]

found out the hard way

so on certain releases of IOS code,
when you SNMP poll MIB 1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.5.4795
or in english lldpXMedMIB

it makes your CPU processor go to 100% and stay there.


Bug ID CSCuu05714

That's a nice feature.

Yes - say thank you!

So... I heard a crazy one the other day on the 9500.  A VLAN was removed and the switch crashed. Called TAC and the solution was to put the VLAN back.  If anyone is familiar with this, I'd LOVE to get the bug id.  Thanks.

[icecream-guy]

SO if you have a Cisco 6800 with 10G/40G interfaces running 15.1(2)SY code, and specific modules as noted in the bug scrub,
apparently packet padding does not work. Legit packets of less than 64 bytes get dropped rather than padded to 64 bytes
and sent out the egress interface.

took a long time for the team to figure this one. (luckily, I wasn't on this task, i'd of pulled my hair out.)

CSCut40421 if you are interested.

[Dieselboy]

Just had this bug created from my TAC case: https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuw80259

In short, CUCM 11 / CUPS (IM&P) 11 now uses Active Directory groups so you can bung all your users in to certain groups such as "developers" and then your users can populate their contacts list with a group. So if people join or leave the company or change roles in the company, the contacts list is managed by the AD group and not the end user. So everyones contacts list is updated automatically. However, the problem is when you have users in the AD group contact, their extension number shows up as "unknown" rather than "Work"..

Did Cisco even test it?

[deanwebb]

They probably tested it, but only with the CLI.