My LAG is bigger than your LAG....

Started by NetworkGroover, October 27, 2015, 11:47:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

burnyd

Quote from: AspiringNetworker on October 28, 2015, 10:35:55 AM
Quote from: burnyd on October 27, 2015, 10:57:00 PM
I feel dirty reading this thread. Any sort of mlag is bad mkay.

Interesting statement.  Why do you feel that way?  Does that include between ToR and host?

Yes for both.  The Arista one is  a bit cleaner as it just shares the sysdb state which is really neato but I generally do not like control plane fate sharing.  I think anyone who has worked with mlag chassis has been burned by something in the past. 

As far as host mode goes there are many ways now to get active active out of both links.  Most end hosts are either virtualized in a typical VMware fashion or containerized and there are easy ways to get forwarding out of both links.

SimonV

Wouldn't like to draw that network diagram  :twisted:

NetworkGroover

Quote from: SimonV on October 28, 2015, 11:29:24 AM
Wouldn't like to draw that network diagram  :twisted:

Haha... I learned that lesson a long time ago and now just draw a thick colored line with a legend that says something to the effect of, "4x40G".  Unless of course you're talking about a rack elevation/cabling diagram.. then.. yyeeeeaaahhhhh that's gotta suck.
Engineer by day, DJ by night, family first always

NetworkGroover

Quote from: burnyd on October 28, 2015, 11:22:12 AM
Quote from: AspiringNetworker on October 28, 2015, 10:35:55 AM
Quote from: burnyd on October 27, 2015, 10:57:00 PM
I feel dirty reading this thread. Any sort of mlag is bad mkay.

Interesting statement.  Why do you feel that way?  Does that include between ToR and host?

Yes for both.  The Arista one is  a bit cleaner as it just shares the sysdb state which is really neato but I generally do not like control plane fate sharing.  I think anyone who has worked with mlag chassis has been burned by something in the past. 

As far as host mode goes there are many ways now to get active active out of both links.  Most end hosts are either virtualized in a typical VMware fashion or containerized and there are easy ways to get forwarding out of both links.

Agree, though I will say, sounding completely bias of course, in the now almost two years (Wow - combat veteran status right there ;P) I've been working on this stuff, I haven't seen a single MLAG issue.  Even during a major upgrade between a 4.14 version and a 4.15 version.  I'm not used to that at all ;P 

At Websense, expecting anything to communicate between each other even between minor versions was a crap shot.... and you know what the "recommended" upgrade process was, half the time?  Remove and reinstall... lol. Hopefully it's gotten better since those days...
Engineer by day, DJ by night, family first always

NetworkGroover

Engineer by day, DJ by night, family first always

burnyd


that1guy15

That1guy15
@that1guy_15
blog.movingonesandzeros.net

wintermute000

#22
Quote from: burnyd on October 28, 2015, 11:57:38 AM
lol I also hate switch stacks.

Every time a customer says to me 'we have a redundant stack as our core' I die a little inside.
They also die a little inside each time I have to tell them they have to down their nice 3750X stack for an hour to go from 12 to 15. 'But they're redundant!'. BZZZZT SINGLE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL PLANE lol. No I'm not game to do a rolling stack upgrade.


I remember this one customer who I had to down their entire regional hub (3750X stack... nice....) as there was a memory leak (nice IOS 15 switch code!) that made it impossible to log in. On the console, it came up with 'no memory for AAA process' type syslog and their graphing showed a nice 95% utilisation flatline LOL (unrelated but a month after the reboot the utilisation hadn't increased, never got to the bottom of the reason for the original leak).

VSS is just as bad, probably worse as you're dealing with bigger networks and corresponding bigger kerfuffle per outage/incident.

Maybe its the NSX brainwashing but L3 ECMP core and L3 to the distro/edge or GTFO and no your user switches do not need active/active MLAG or FEX or whatever, show me your cacti graphs again for your access uplinks? LOLOL


but yes MEC is nice and one L3 device makes it really simple for the L1/L2 types to understand. They don't even have to remember to type in show standby. Finally I've actually never seen anyone run GLBP in prod, even the big boys (banks, big oil etc.), maybe its just my luck. Then again I've never seen anyone run VTPv3 either.

NetworkGroover

Engineer by day, DJ by night, family first always


that1guy15

That1guy15
@that1guy_15
blog.movingonesandzeros.net

burnyd

haha in some ways I would prefer that to some cisco dc networking gear.

that1guy15

Thats a good point. Sometime dead simple is the best solution.
That1guy15
@that1guy_15
blog.movingonesandzeros.net

deanwebb

Quote from: that1guy15 on October 29, 2015, 12:05:23 PM
Thats a good point. Sometime dead simple is the best solution.

Hello. I have some gear from Belkin that will absolutely baffle you.
Take a baseball bat and trash all the routers, shout out "IT'S A NETWORK PROBLEM NOW, SUCKERS!" and then peel out of the parking lot in your Ferrari.
"The world could perish if people only worked on things that were easy to handle." -- Vladimir Savchenko
Вопросы есть? Вопросов нет! | BCEB: Belkin Certified Expert Baffler | "Plan B is Plan A with an element of panic." -- John Clarke
Accounting is architecture, remember that!
Air gaps are high-latency Internet connections.