WAN Vendor Experiences?

Started by deanwebb, June 08, 2015, 09:41:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

deanwebb

Currently, my experience is with BT. Our primary WAN link is dropping about 40%+ of its packets, and we didn't switch over to the secondary link. We had to call *them* to tell them of our service degradation, even though we have some pretty high-level support we're paying for that's supposed to alert us of issues.

I'm actually getting better Internet on the guest wireless network than on the corporate one. Lolz.

Current opinion of BT:  :developers:

My WAN manager, however, feels more like:
:rage:

What are your WAN vendor experiences like?
Take a baseball bat and trash all the routers, shout out "IT'S A NETWORK PROBLEM NOW, SUCKERS!" and then peel out of the parking lot in your Ferrari.
"The world could perish if people only worked on things that were easy to handle." -- Vladimir Savchenko
Вопросы есть? Вопросов нет! | BCEB: Belkin Certified Expert Baffler | "Plan B is Plan A with an element of panic." -- John Clarke
Accounting is architecture, remember that!
Air gaps are high-latency Internet connections.

Reggle

I had such a story with Interoute. Redundant links, one link goes down, I call them, they kill the other link. Twice. Telling them not to touch anything and call us first: same thing.
I have to admit that after a few angry escalations they did became more cooperative.

I've heard stories about other local (Central European) WAN providers that aren't much better. One of them kept blaming me for misconfiguring BGP on my side, insisting their side was fine. You know, the typical e-mail with managers in cc. Next came my reply with evidence of an ICMP type 3 code 13 - Administratively Prohobited. Me: "Could it be an ACL on your side?"

After some silence and a sudden BGP-5-ADJCHANGE syslog: "We found an ACL..."

routerdork

Put in a ticket with AT&T to have the BGP AS changed on a circuit that wasn't being utilized yet. Come in the next day to find that they changed it on the active circuit and now the site is down.  :angry:
"The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot confirm their validity." -Abraham Lincoln

NetworkGroover

Quote from: routerdork on June 09, 2015, 07:49:53 AM
Put in a ticket with AT&T to have the BGP AS changed on a circuit that wasn't being utilized yet. Come in the next day to find that they changed it on the active circuit and now the site is down.  :angry:

Good lord....... ouch.
Engineer by day, DJ by night, family first always

NetworkGroover

Quote from: Reggle on June 09, 2015, 02:35:46 AM
I had such a story with Interoute. Redundant links, one link goes down, I call them, they kill the other link. Twice. Telling them not to touch anything and call us first: same thing.
I have to admit that after a few angry escalations they did became more cooperative.

I've heard stories about other local (Central European) WAN providers that aren't much better. One of them kept blaming me for misconfiguring BGP on my side, insisting their side was fine. You know, the typical e-mail with managers in cc. Next came my reply with evidence of an ICMP type 3 code 13 - Administratively Prohobited. Me: "Could it be an ACL on your side?"

After some silence and a sudden BGP-5-ADJCHANGE syslog: "We found an ACL..."

:problem?: :problem?: :problem?:

We need an "owned" emoticon.
Engineer by day, DJ by night, family first always