ASK THE HEADHUNTER LinkedIn & Indeed aren’t good sources of hires because they don’t know anybody

Started by deanwebb, August 10, 2021, 12:10:39 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

deanwebb

LinkedIn & Indeed aren't good sources of hires because they don't know anybody

Question Whatever sources of hires you use, are you more interested in passive or active candidates? By passive I mean people that aren't actively looking. Nick’s Reply First, you shouldn't worry about what any headhunter is interested in. Headhunters are involved in relatively few hires among all jobs that get filled every day. You should be focused instead on conducting your own job search and cultivating good professional contacts. Most hires come from respected sources in your field that know and recommend you. That's why websites like LinkedIn and Indeed are lousy sources of hires and jobs. They have no


The post LinkedIn & Indeed aren’t good sources of hires because they don’t know anybody appeared first on Ask The Headhunter®.




Source: LinkedIn & Indeed aren't good sources of hires because they don't know anybody
Take a baseball bat and trash all the routers, shout out "IT'S A NETWORK PROBLEM NOW, SUCKERS!" and then peel out of the parking lot in your Ferrari.
"The world could perish if people only worked on things that were easy to handle." -- Vladimir Savchenko
Вопросы есть? Вопросов нет! | BCEB: Belkin Certified Expert Baffler | "Plan B is Plan A with an element of panic." -- John Clarke
Accounting is architecture, remember that!
Air gaps are high-latency Internet connections.