Static Route Courtesy

Started by deanwebb, June 05, 2017, 10:09:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

deanwebb

Just had this come up in a meeting and it sounds very reasonable.

When entering a static route, use the "name" function, if available, to comment what the route is for. This can be very helpful when troubleshooting L3 issues and in understanding connectivity patterns.

Too bad ASA firewalls can't do that, but at least our core and distro switches can do it.
Take a baseball bat and trash all the routers, shout out "IT'S A NETWORK PROBLEM NOW, SUCKERS!" and then peel out of the parking lot in your Ferrari.
"The world could perish if people only worked on things that were easy to handle." -- Vladimir Savchenko
Вопросы есть? Вопросов нет! | BCEB: Belkin Certified Expert Baffler | "Plan B is Plan A with an element of panic." -- John Clarke
Accounting is architecture, remember that!
Air gaps are high-latency Internet connections.

icecream-guy

Quote from: deanwebb on June 05, 2017, 10:09:24 AM
Just had this come up in a meeting and it sounds very reasonable.

When entering a static route, use the "name" function, if available, to comment what the route is for. This can be very helpful when troubleshooting L3 issues and in understanding connectivity patterns.

Too bad ASA firewalls can't do that, but at least our core and distro switches can do it.
:zomgwtfbbq:

on the ASA
access-list OUTSIDE_IN remark *****************************************************
:professorcat:

My Moral Fibers have been cut.

deanwebb

Quote from: ristau5741 on June 05, 2017, 10:37:23 AM
Quote from: deanwebb on June 05, 2017, 10:09:24 AM
Just had this come up in a meeting and it sounds very reasonable.

When entering a static route, use the "name" function, if available, to comment what the route is for. This can be very helpful when troubleshooting L3 issues and in understanding connectivity patterns.

Too bad ASA firewalls can't do that, but at least our core and distro switches can do it.
:zomgwtfbbq:

on the ASA
access-list OUTSIDE_IN remark *****************************************************

:doh:

I was looking for the "name" command in the syntax! :lol:
Take a baseball bat and trash all the routers, shout out "IT'S A NETWORK PROBLEM NOW, SUCKERS!" and then peel out of the parking lot in your Ferrari.
"The world could perish if people only worked on things that were easy to handle." -- Vladimir Savchenko
Вопросы есть? Вопросов нет! | BCEB: Belkin Certified Expert Baffler | "Plan B is Plan A with an element of panic." -- John Clarke
Accounting is architecture, remember that!
Air gaps are high-latency Internet connections.

SimonV

My ex colleague introduced this to our configuration guidelines and I must admit it's pretty damn handy.  But for some reason I seem to remember from some syntax guide that it was intended to specify the name of the next-hop. Could be remembering it wrong though.

SofaKing

We started doing this on our retail routers.  Oddly enough the command does not work when adding static routes for DHCP.  No problem with static or PPPoE routes.  I agree that it is helpful.
Networking -  You can talk about us but you can't talk without us!

Dieselboy

Definitely helps track static routes! Especially at a time when you're debugging and you go "WTF is that in there"... and then you read "... name Static route for XXX" - and then you just know.  :smug: